Nomadvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 17 047 | 24 039 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with