LXDvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LXD | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 4 844 | 24 039 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 11 |
| Latest release | lxd-6.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 70/100 for LXD, so it is the safer default.
LXD ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, LXD is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
LXD details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep LXD, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with