NomadvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 17 047 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with