actions-runner-controllervsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
actions-runner-controller ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+93 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →