Nodyxvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nodyx | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 6 in Community | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 137 | 24 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +785 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.12.0 · 10 Aug 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Svelte | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 48/100 for Nodyx, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Nodyx.
If you want the quickest setup, Nodyx is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+785 stars in 30 days).
Nodyx details →temporal details →