Loomiovstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Loomio | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 2 622 | 24 057 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.13.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 64/100 for Loomio, so it is the safer default.
Loomio ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Loomio is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
Loomio details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Loomio, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with