Node REDvsquackback
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Node RED | quackback | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 26 in Automation | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 23 793 | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 15 |
| Latest release | 4.1.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Node RED scores 81/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
Node RED ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.
If you want the quickest setup, Node RED is easier to run; quackback needs more configuration.
Node RED is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
Node RED details →quackback details →
Swap a project
Keep Node RED, compare it with
Keep quackback, compare it with