nocodbvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 65 375 | 35 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +313 | +1 676 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 5 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 676 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with