ActivepiecesvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 25 266 | 35 514 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 | +1 682 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 682 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →RustFS details →