apitablevsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 35 514 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +1 682 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.
RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 682 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →RustFS details →