nocodbvsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 65 374 | 20 022 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +320 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 2 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 69/100 for Qinglong, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →Qinglong details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep Qinglong, compare it with