AutomatischvsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Automatisch | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 | 20 027 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Automatisch and Qinglong score the same (69/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Qinglong ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Automatisch.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; Automatisch needs more configuration.
Automatisch is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).
Automatisch details →Qinglong details →