apitablevsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 20 027 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Qinglong scores 69/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.
Qinglong ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.
apitable is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →Qinglong details →