NGINXvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NGINX | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Web Servers | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 32 003 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +279 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 2 |
| Latest release | release-1.31.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
NGINX scores 84/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
NGINX ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; NGINX needs more configuration.
NGINX is growing faster right now (+279 stars in 30 days).
NGINX details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep NGINX, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with