Dufsvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 10 997 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Dufs is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with