NGINXvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NGINX | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Web Servers | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 32 003 | 45 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +279 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 34 |
| Latest release | release-1.31.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 84/100 for NGINX, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for NGINX.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
NGINX details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep NGINX, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with