DufsvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 997 | 45 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +1 644 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 35 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with