CaddyvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 78 533 | 45 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 471 | +1 644 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 35 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 87/100 for Reactive Resume, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Caddy details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with