Nginx Proxy ManagervsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nginx Proxy Manager | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 24 in Reverse Proxy | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 34 572 | 9 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +345 | +60 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.16.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Nginx Proxy Manager scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
Nginx Proxy Manager ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
If you want the quickest setup, Nginx Proxy Manager is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.
Nginx Proxy Manager is growing faster right now (+345 stars in 30 days).
Nginx Proxy Manager details →Octoprint details →