Nextcloud MemoriesvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nextcloud Memories | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 3 867 | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 12 |
| Latest release | v10.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Java |
Which one should you pick?
SonarQube scores 71/100 against 69/100 for Nextcloud Memories, so it is the safer default.
Nextcloud Memories ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, Nextcloud Memories is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
SonarQube is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).
Nextcloud Memories details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep Nextcloud Memories, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with