next-image-transformationvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| next-image-transformation | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 13 in Image Processing | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 638 | 114 268 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 520 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 40/100 for next-image-transformation, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for next-image-transformation.
If you want the quickest setup, next-image-transformation is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 520 stars in 30 days).
next-image-transformation details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep next-image-transformation, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with