netxmsvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| netxms | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 417 | 16 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +245 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 31 |
| Latest release | release-6.2.4 · 2 Sept 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 55/100 for netxms, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for netxms.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; netxms needs more configuration.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+245 stars in 30 days).
netxms details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →