netdatavsRejourney
Two self-hosted Datadog alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| netdata | Rejourney | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #16 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 81 200 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +566 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | unity-v0.1.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
netdata scores 87/100 against 46/100 for Rejourney, so it is the safer default.
netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rejourney.
If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; Rejourney needs more configuration.
netdata is growing faster right now (+566 stars in 30 days).
netdata details →Rejourney details → All Datadog alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep netdata, compare it with
Keep Rejourney, compare it with