corootvsRejourney
Two self-hosted Datadog alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coroot | Rejourney | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #16 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 7 994 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.28.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | unity-v0.1.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
coroot scores 69/100 against 46/100 for Rejourney, so it is the safer default.
coroot ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rejourney.
If you want the quickest setup, coroot is easier to run; Rejourney needs more configuration.
coroot is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).
coroot details →Rejourney details → All Datadog alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep coroot, compare it with
Keep Rejourney, compare it with