netdatavsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| netdata | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 81 200 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +566 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
netdata scores 87/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
netdata is growing faster right now (+566 stars in 30 days).
netdata details →Qtap details →
Swap a project
Keep netdata, compare it with
Keep Qtap, compare it with