netboxvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| netbox | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 34 in Network Management | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 21 783 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +186 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 2 |
| Latest release | v4.7.4 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
netbox scores 79/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
netbox ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; netbox needs more configuration.
netbox is growing faster right now (+186 stars in 30 days).
netbox details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep netbox, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with