Pi-holevsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 61 545 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +483 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 2 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+483 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with