namervstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| namer | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 332 | 24 044 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +784 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.
If you want the quickest setup, namer is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+784 stars in 30 days).
namer details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep namer, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with