namervsOwncast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| namer | Owncast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 332 | 11 632 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Owncast scores 73/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.
namer ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.
If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; namer needs more configuration.
Owncast is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
namer details →Owncast details →
Swap a project
Keep namer, compare it with
Keep Owncast, compare it with