multicavsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 54 174 | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 866 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, multica is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 866 stars in 30 days).
multica details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with