openclawvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 393 300 | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 876 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 12 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 876 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with