multicavsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 54 158 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 850 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 850 stars in 30 days).
multica details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with