openclawvsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 393 291 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 943 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 943 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with