multicavsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 124 in AI | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 54 197 | 589 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 889 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; multica needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 889 stars in 30 days).
multica details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with