MTranServervsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MTranServer | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Translation | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 4 731 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | C++ | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MTranServer scores 63/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
MTranServer ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, MTranServer is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
MTranServer is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).
MTranServer details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep MTranServer, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with