MTranServervsunopim
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MTranServer | unopim | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Translation | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 731 | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 17 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
unopim scores 69/100 against 63/100 for MTranServer, so it is the safer default.
unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for MTranServer.
If you want the quickest setup, MTranServer is easier to run; unopim needs more configuration.
unopim is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).
MTranServer details →unopim details →
Swap a project
Keep MTranServer, compare it with
Keep unopim, compare it with