mouseholevstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mousehole | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #64 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 318 | 24 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +787 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.5.0 · 20 Jun 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 44/100 for mousehole, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for mousehole.
If you want the quickest setup, mousehole is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).
mousehole details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep mousehole, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with