mos-releasesvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mos-releases | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 8 in Operating System | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 657 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.6.1-stable · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 41/100 for mos-releases, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for mos-releases.
If you want the quickest setup, mos-releases is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
mos-releases details →Windows ARM details →