monoscopevsRejourney
Two self-hosted Datadog alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| monoscope | Rejourney | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #40 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #16 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 2 008 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +176 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.6.31 · 10 Oct 2026 | unity-v0.1.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Haskell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
monoscope scores 60/100 against 46/100 for Rejourney, so it is the safer default.
monoscope ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rejourney.
If you want the quickest setup, monoscope is easier to run; Rejourney needs more configuration.
monoscope is growing faster right now (+176 stars in 30 days).
monoscope details →Rejourney details → All Datadog alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep monoscope, compare it with
Keep Rejourney, compare it with