mkcertWebvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mkcertWeb | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 221 | 16 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.4.3 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.
mkcertWeb ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; mkcertWeb needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+543 stars in 30 days).
mkcertWeb details →Vert details →
Swap a project
Keep mkcertWeb, compare it with
Keep Vert, compare it with