mitmproxyvstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mitmproxy | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 46 467 | 16 647 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 323 | +248 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 49 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 323 stars in 30 days).
mitmproxy details →trigger details →