mitmproxyvsRustDesk Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mitmproxy | RustDesk Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop |
| GitHub stars | 46 451 | 10 627 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 316 | +178 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 2 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 75/100 for RustDesk Server, so it is the safer default.
mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RustDesk Server.
If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 316 stars in 30 days).
mitmproxy details →RustDesk Server details →