MiroTalk C2CvsOpenVidu
Two self-hosted Zoom alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MiroTalk C2C | OpenVidu | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #9 of 33 in Communication |
| GitHub stars | 520 | 2 138 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v3.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenVidu scores 62/100 against 56/100 for MiroTalk C2C, so it is the safer default.
OpenVidu ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for MiroTalk C2C.
If you want the quickest setup, MiroTalk C2C is easier to run; OpenVidu needs more configuration.
MiroTalk C2C is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
MiroTalk C2C details →OpenVidu details → All Zoom alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep MiroTalk C2C, compare it with
Keep OpenVidu, compare it with