MiroTalk P2PvsOpenVidu
Two self-hosted Zoom alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MiroTalk P2P | OpenVidu | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #9 of 33 in Communication |
| GitHub stars | 4 810 | 2 138 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v3.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MiroTalk P2P scores 64/100 against 62/100 for OpenVidu, so it is the safer default.
OpenVidu ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for MiroTalk P2P.
If you want the quickest setup, MiroTalk P2P is easier to run; OpenVidu needs more configuration.
MiroTalk P2P is growing faster right now (+62 stars in 30 days).
MiroTalk P2P details →OpenVidu details → All Zoom alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep MiroTalk P2P, compare it with
Keep OpenVidu, compare it with