Jitsi VideobridgevsMiroTalk C2C
Two self-hosted Zoom alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Jitsi Videobridge | MiroTalk C2C | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #14 of 25 in Video Conferencing |
| GitHub stars | 3 107 | 520 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | stable/jitsi-meet_11248 · 14 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Kotlin | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Jitsi Videobridge scores 65/100 against 56/100 for MiroTalk C2C, so it is the safer default.
Jitsi Videobridge ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for MiroTalk C2C.
If you want the quickest setup, MiroTalk C2C is easier to run; Jitsi Videobridge needs more configuration.
MiroTalk C2C is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
Jitsi Videobridge details →MiroTalk C2C details → All Zoom alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Jitsi Videobridge, compare it with
Keep MiroTalk C2C, compare it with