MirobodyvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 13 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +299 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.
Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Mirobody needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).
Mirobody details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with