MirobodyvsRedis
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | Redis | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 77 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +687 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 36 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | 8.10.3 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Redis scores 86/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.
Redis ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mirobody.
Redis is growing faster right now (+687 stars in 30 days).
Mirobody details →Redis details →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep Redis, compare it with