MirobodyvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 61 546 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +484 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 6 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.
Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+484 stars in 30 days).
Mirobody details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with