MirobodyvsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 15 376 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 13 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mirobody.
If you want the quickest setup, Mirobody is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
Mirobody details →PeerTube details →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep PeerTube, compare it with