milvusvsScreenTinker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| milvus | ScreenTinker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 46 514 | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +271 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.6.26 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
milvus scores 82/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.
milvus ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ScreenTinker.
If you want the quickest setup, ScreenTinker is easier to run; milvus needs more configuration.
milvus is growing faster right now (+271 stars in 30 days).
milvus details →ScreenTinker details →
Swap a project
Keep milvus, compare it with
Keep ScreenTinker, compare it with